Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coen, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coen, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Perverse Defenses in Neurotic Patients

Stanley J. Coen

Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research, Sjcoenmd{at}aol.com

Distinguishing perverse defenses from the concept of obligatory perversion allows perverse defenses to be examined in neurotic patients. Perverse defenses against reality, one's conflicts, and relationships with others are connected with affect intolerance, difficulty with analytic collaboration, and analytic impasse. Perverse defenses, including the cultivation of states of distraction, excitement, and pomposity, as well as perverse sadomasochistic relations with others, protect against the unbearable: intense affects, painful ideas, and loving, committed need of a valued, distinct person. Patients' perverse, vindictive refusal to be reasonable provokes perverse countertransference reactions whereby the analyst stands in judgmentally and critically for the seemingly absent demands of reason, morality, and analytic progress.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 46, No. 4, 1169-1194 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651980460040601
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
S. J. Coen
Narcissistic Temptations to Cross Boundaries and How to Manage Them
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2007; 55(4): 1169 - 1190.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
S. J. Coen
The Thrall of the Negative and How to Analyze it
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2003; 51(2): 465 - 489.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
M. Wilson
The Analyst's Desire and the Problem of Narcissistic Resistances
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, March 1, 2003; 51(1): 71 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
S. J. Coen
The Wish To Regress in Patient and Analyst
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, September 1, 2000; 48(3): 785 - 810.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
S. J. Coen
Why We Need to Write Openly About Our Clinical Cases
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2000; 48(2): 449 - 470.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
S. J. Coen
Clinical Discussants as Psychoanalytic Readers
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2000; 48(2): 471 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]