This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vaughan, S. C. Articles by Roose, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vaughan, S. C. Articles by Roose, S. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Patient-Therapist Match: Revelation or Resistance?

College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 25 West 81st Street, Suite 1C New York, NY 10024

Steven P. Roose

College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University

Patient-therapist match is a relatively new yet frequently invoked concept within psychoanalysis. Despite Freud's appreciation of the influence of the analyst's past to his or her work within the analytic setting, psychoanalysts have historically held varied opinions about the degree to which the analyst's personality and conflicts affect the analytic process. As analysis was reconfigured as a two-person system, attention focused on the fit between patient and analyst. The literature on patient-therapist match is reviewed, and the conclusion reached that this intuitively appealing concept suffers from a lack of rigorous definition and operationalization. Many authors invoke match in ways that imply that it is real, static, external to the domain of analytic inquiry, and unaffected by analytic process. In its present form, the concept of patient-therapist match obstructs rather than facilitates analytic exploration and obscures rather than clarifies what happens between analyst and analysand in psychoanalysis. By suggesting that match exists as a reality outside the domain of transference and countertransference, analysts may overlook the importance of psychoanalytic technique in creating a sense of match. Analysts may attribute stalemated or limited analyses to a bad match, rather than tenaciously exploring the transference-countertransference configurations that remain at the heart of analytic work.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 48, No. 3, 885-899 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651000480031901


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Craige Mourning Analysis: The Post-Termination Phase J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2002; 50(2): 507 - 550. [Abstract] [PDF]