Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulish, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kulish, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Primary Femininity: Clinical Advances and Theoretical Ambiguities

Nancy Kulish

625 Purdy Birmingham, MI 48009, Nkulish{at}aol.com, Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Wayne State University School of Medicine

This paper examines the use of the term "primary femininity" in current psychoanalytic thinking. The concept of primary femininity arose in reaction to early theories about female sexuality and development; based on a model of male development, these presented problems when applied to females. The author attempts to demonstrate the clinical advances that have resulted from the idea of primary femininity. At the same time she argues that the idea has been used to carry widely differing meanings, and has reflected many writers' differing frames of reference, which range from gender identity through biological traits, object relations, genital anxieties, and bisexuality. Like the terms it originally was intended to replace or augment, it has come to be used reductionistically or loosely. The author warns against its misuse and argues that primary femininity is not a unitary concept, but rather encompasses a related group of ideas about the female body and mind.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1355-1379 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651000480041401
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
D. Elise
Sex and Shame: The Inhibition of Female Desires
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, March 1, 2008; 56(1): 73 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
J. Stern
Cyclones, Bi-Cycles, and Psychoanalysis: the Witch-of-Us? Complex and the Wizard of Oz
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2003; 51(4): 1241 - 1261.
[Abstract] [PDF]