This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wallerstein, R. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wallerstein, R. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Growth and Transformation of American Ego Psychology

290 Beach Road Belvedere, CA 94920, Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute

The roots of ego psychology trace back to Sigmund Freud's The Ego and the Id (1923) and "Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety" (1926), works followed by two additional fundaments, Anna Freud's The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense (1936) and Heinz Hartmann's Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation (1939). It was brought to full flowering in post—World War II America by Hartmann and his many collaborators, and for over two decades it maintained a monolithic hegemony over American psychoanalysis. Within this framework the conceptions of the psychoanalytic psychotherapies evolved as specific modifications of psychoanalytic technique directed to the clinical needs of the spectrum of patients not amenable to psychoanalysis proper. This American consensus on the ego psychology paradigm and its array of technical implementations fragmented several decades ago, with the rise in America of Kohut's self psychology, geared to the narcissistic disorders, and with the importation from Britain of neo-Kleinian and object-relational perspectives, all coinciding with the rapid growth of the varieties of relational psychoanalysis, with its shift in focus to the two-person, interactive, and co-constructed transference-countertransference matrix. Implications of this intermingled theoretical pluralism (as contrasted with the unity of the once dominant ego psychology paradigm) for the evolution of the American ego psychology are spelled out.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 50, No. 1, 135-168 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651020500011401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Shevrin The Consequences of Abandoning a Comprehensive Psychoanalytic Theory: Revisiting Rapaport's sYstematizing Attempt J Am Psychoanal Assoc, September 1, 2003; 51(3): 1005 - 1020. [PDF]

				L. Rangell The Theory of Psychoanalysis: Vicissitudes of Its Evolution J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2002; 50(4): 1109 - 1137. [PDF]