|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Developments in Cognitive NeuroscienceII. Implications for Theories of Transference
Drew Westen
Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders Department of Psychology Boston University 648 Beacon Street, 6th floor Boston, MA 02215, Dwesten{at}bu.edu
Glen O. Gabbard
Department of Psychiatry Baylor College of Medicine One Baylor Plaza Houston, TX 77030, Ggabbard12{at}aol.com
An integration of psychoanalytic theory with contemporary developments in cognitive neuroscience offers a useful perspective on long-standing controversies about the nature of transference, and a better understanding of the precise mechanisms by which transferential processes occur. Contemporary psychoanalytic views of transference are reviewed, and the many processes that constitute transference are described. Two issues that have emerged in different guises for several decades—the role of the analyst in eliciting transference, and the nature of "real" and "transferential" components of the therapeutic relationship—are reconsidered in the light of concepts such as connectionist networks. Although a useful analytic stance is one that allows the patient's enduring dynamics to dominate the analytic field, it is suggested, anonymity is neither a cognitive possibility nor the driving force behind most transference reactions, and the distinction between "real" and "transferential" perceptions is one of therapeutic interest, not of mechanism. Certain features of the analytic situation make some dynamics more likely than others to enter the treatment relationship, notably those related to authority, intimacy and attachment, and sexuality. Transference reactions are best understood as constructed from a combination of the patient's enduring dispositions to react in particular ways under particular conditions; features of the analytic situation and of the analyst; and interactions between patient and analyst. These reactions do not unfold ineluctably from the patient's mind in the consulting room, nor are they cognitive constructions of the patient-analyst dyad or co-constructions of relatively equal partners exerting their influence on the analytic field.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 50, No. 1,
99-134 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651020500011601
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. M. Vivona
Leaping From Brain To Mind: a Critique of Mirror Neuron Explanations of Countertransference
J Am Psychoanal Assoc,
June 1, 2009;
57(3):
525 - 550.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. O. Gabbard
What is A "Good Enough" Termination?
J Am Psychoanal Assoc,
June 1, 2009;
57(3):
575 - 594.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.W. Meissner
Toward a Neuropsychological Reconstruction of Projective Identification
J Am Psychoanal Assoc,
February 1, 2009;
57(1):
95 - 129.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Gordon
The Two-Minute Check-in at the Beginning of Psychoanalytic Group Therapy Sessions
Group Analysis,
December 1, 2008;
41(4):
366 - 372.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Waugaman
Book Review: THE DREAM INTERPRETERS: A PSYCHOANALYTIC NOVEL IN VERSE. By Howard Shevrin. New York: International Universities Press, 2003, xix + 375 pp., $34.95 paper
J Am Psychoanal Assoc,
December 1, 2003;
51(4):
1420 - 1424.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Beutel, E. Stern, and D. A. Silbersweig
The Emerging Dialogue Between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience: Neuroimaging Perspectives
J Am Psychoanal Assoc,
September 1, 2003;
51(3):
773 - 801.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cavell
The Social Character of Thinking
J Am Psychoanal Assoc,
September 1, 2003;
51(3):
803 - 824.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
