This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jones, E. E. Articles by Ablon, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jones, E. E. Articles by Ablon, J. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On Analytic Process

J. Stuart Ablon

CPS Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital 313 Washington Street, Suite 402 Newton, MA 02458, sablon{at}sprintpcs.com

An innovative methodology is presented for identifying and assessing change process in psychoanalytic treatments. Using the Psychotherapy Process Q-set (PQS), a panel of experienced psychoanalysts developed a prototype of an ideal psychoanalytic hour. This prototype was then applied to verbatim transcripts of three archived treatment samples: psychoanalyses, long-term analytic therapies, and brief psychodynamic therapies. The degree to which these treatments fostered an analytic process as represented by the prototype was measured quantitatively. Analytic process was significantly more present in psychoanalyses than in the long-term analytic therapies, which, in turn fostered significantly more analytic process than did brief psychodynamic therapies. The study demonstrates that, given descriptive language that does not represent a particular theoretical perspective, analysts can agree on a definition of analytic process, and that analytic process can be operationalized and quantitatively assessed. A second study demonstrates that despite consensus on its definition, there is not just one proper analytic process; rather, there are change processes unique to each dyad. Two quantitative case studies illustrate how each analytic pair has a unique interaction pattern linked to treatment progress. These dyad-unique "interaction structures" are recurrent, mutually influencing patterns of interaction, the experience, recognition, and comprehension of which appear to be a fundamental component of therapeutic action. A bipersonal model is described that attempts to bridge theories of therapeutic action that focus on insight and self-understanding and those that emphasize the patient's experience of the therapist.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 53, No. 2, 541-568 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651050530020101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bambery, J. H. Porcerelli, and J. S. Ablon Summaries of the Sixth Annual Poster Session of the American Psychoanalytic Association: Part 1 Prototypes of Psychodynamic and Cbt Psychotherapy With Adolescents: Development and Applications for Training J Am Psychoanal Assoc, February 1, 2009; 57(1): 175 - 181. [PDF]

				S. T. Hauser Studying Psychoanalysis: Asking and Answering the Hard Questions J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2006; 54(2): 561 - 569. [PDF]

				S. J. Blatt, J. Corveleyn, and P. Luyten Minding the Gap Between Positivism and Hermeneutics in Psychoanalytic Research J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2006; 54(2): 571 - 610. [Abstract] [PDF]