Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pine, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pine, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Psychoanalytic Dictionary: A Position Paper On Diversity and Its Unifiers

Fred Pine

55 East 87th Street (1B) New York, NY 10128, fpine{at}att.net

An attempt is made to create a conceptual housing for an increasingly common stance among clinicians who willingly draw from diverse theories as they seem applicable to the immediate clinical moment. The working clinician generally does this without regard to questions of eclectic contradiction or of whether concepts can be extricated from the theories in which they are embedded. The metaphor of a psychoanalytic dictionary is used to create this conceptual housing. Within this metaphor, a psychoanalytic alphabet, vocabulary, and grammar are defined, as well as a set of core assumptions that gives some shape to the boundaries of the psychoanalytic language. Diversity is located in the preferred alphabets and vocabularies of varied psychoanalysts, and unifiers are found in the grammar and core assumptions of the language. Questions regarding internally inconsistent eclecticism and extricability are discussed. The integrative concepts chosen here (among the many that are possible)—concepts defining a shared view of how mind works— are found in such familiar ideas as displacement, condensation, overdetermination, and multiple function.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 54, No. 2, 463-491 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/00030651060540021701


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
R. Lombardi
Through the Eye of the Needle: the Unfolding of the Unconscious Body
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, February 1, 2009; 57(1): 61 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
D. E. Panzer
Panel Report: Multiple Models in Clinical Practice: Bane or Blessing?
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2008; 56(2): 595 - 609.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychoanal AssocHome page
J. Lieberman
Masculinity in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction
J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2006; 54(4): 1059 - 1066.
[PDF]