This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0003065109342096v1 57/5/1071    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Furlong, A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Furlong, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Meditation on Lovesickness, Loss, and Temporality

2100 Marlowe Avenue #533 Montreal, Quebec H4A 3L5 CANADA, allannahfurlong{at}bellnet.ca

The film 2046 is used as a screen and a springboard from which to reflect on the compulsive plight of some lovesick individuals. A particular oedipal constellation that generates lovesickness is hypothesized, wherein an unmourned third object preoccupies yet frustrates the primary object. This thwarted longing for another on the part of the original parent figure inflicts a defect in the self-esteem of the subject, who is then compelled to seek out an object that will re-create, while promising to repair, the wound. A trait common to the new object of adoration and the old, retriggering the peculiar paradoxical draw of the parent, sets this process in motion. The chaotic temporality so often associated with both the raptures of new love and with the chronic condition of lovesickness may be related to a traumatic hobbling of the ego’s stimulus barrier in the presence of such a paradoxically exciting object.

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 57, No. 5, 1071-1096 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0003065109342096


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?