This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nuetzel, E. J. Articles by Prizmic, Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nuetzel, E. J. Articles by Prizmic, Z. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service Family Issues Talking With Your Doctor Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Dynamics of Empirically Derived Factors in the Therapeutic Relationship

St. Louis Psychoanalytic Institute 8820 Ladue Road, Suite 301 St. Louis, MO 63124 Fax:314-361-6269, ejnuetz{at}swbell.net, Washington University School of Medicine

Randy J. Larsen

Department of Psychology, Washington University

Zvjezdana Prizmic

Department of Psychology, Washington University

The therapeutic relationship is the source of major concepts in psychoanalytic clinical theory. Such concepts as resistance, transference, countertransference, and the alliance are fundamental, even though there may be shifts in meaning between theoretical schools and clinical contexts. In the clinical psychoanalytic literature, disagreement exists over the nature of the alliance and its essential components. Empirical studies using reliable patient, therapist, and observer scales to assess the alliance demonstrate a correlation with psychotherapeutic gains. In the study reported here, thirteen patients were followed for 6 to 33 months of psychodynamic psychotherapy, during which time their views of the therapeutic relationship were assessed, and several experiential measures taken, all on a weekly basis. Statistical analyses reveal that the therapeutic relationship, as reflected in the patients' weekly responses to the St. Louis Therapeutic Relationship Rating Scale, has four distinct components: therapeutic alliance, resistance, transference love, and negative transference. On a week-by-week basis, the therapeutic alliance was the strongest predictor of improvement in patient-reported general adjustment, as reflected in such areas as self-esteem, positive affect, social relations, work productivity, satisfaction, and optimism. Time plots of the variables show the typical time course for the components of the therapeutic relationship, as well as for improvement on the experiential variables. Results indicate that the therapeutic alliance, transference, and resistance are central components of the psychotherapeutic relationship, which in turn predict the ongoing life experience of the patient.

References

• Ablon,J.S., &Jones, E. (1999). Psychotherapy process in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 67:64-75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Blatt, S. (200 1). The effort to identify empirically supported psychological treatments and its implications for clinical research, practice and training: Commentary on papers by Lester Luborsky and Hans H. Strupp. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 11:633-644.
• — & Behrends, R. (1987). Internalization, separation-individuation, and the nature of therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 68:279-297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• — Zuroff, D., Quinlan, D., & Pilkonis, P. (1996). Interpersonal factors in brief treatment of depression: Further analyses of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 64:497-504.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Cutler, S.E., Bunce, S.C., & Larsen, R.J. (1996). Repressive coping style and its relation to daily emotional experience and remembered emotional experience. Journal of Personality 64:379-405.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49:71-75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Freud, S. (1912). The dynamics of transference. Standard Edition 12:99-108.
• — (1915). Observations on transference-love. Standard Edition 12:159-171.
• Friedman, L. (1969). The therapeutic alliance. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 50:139-153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Greenson, R. (1965). The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 34:155-181.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• — & Wexler, M. (1969). The non-transference relationship in the psychoanalytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 50:27-39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Horvath, A., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 61:561-573.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Howard, K., Kopta, S.M., Krause, M., & Orunsky, D. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist 41:159-164.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Krupnick, J., Sotsky, S., Simmons, S., Moyer, J., Elkin, I., Watkins, J., & Pilkonis, P. (1996). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and psychopharmacology outcomes: Findings in the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 64:532-539.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Larsen, R.J. (1989). A process approach to personality: Utilizing time as a facet of data. In Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, ed. D. Buss & N. Cantor. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 177-193.
• — (1990). Spectral analysis of psychological data. In Statistical Methods in Longitudinal Research: Vol. II. Time Series and Categorical Longitudinal Data. Boston: Academic Press, pp. 319-349.
• — (2003). Quantifying idiodynamics: A process approach to personality psychology. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 5:405-423.[CrossRef]
• — (2007a). Applications of within-person covariation analyses to affect. In Handbook of Methods in Positive Psychology, ed. A.D. Ong & M. van Dulmen. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 339-348.
• — (2007b). Personality, emotion, and daily health. The Science of Realtime Data Capture: Setf-reports in Health Research, ed. A. Stone & S. Shiffman. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 251-267.
• — & Diener, E. (1992). Problems and promises with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality & Social Psychology 13:25-59.
• —— & Emmons, R.A. (1986). Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 51:803-814.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• — & Kasinatis, M. (1991). Day-to-day physical symptoms: Individual differences in the occurrence, duration, and emotional concomitants of minor daily illnesses. Journal of Personality 59:387-423.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T., Levitt, J., Seligman, D., Berman, J., & Krause, E. (2003). Are some psychotherapies much more effective than others? Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies 5:455-460.
• Martin, D., Garske, J., & Davis, K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 68:438-450.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Nuetzel, E.J. (1999). Psychoanalysis as a dramatic art. Annual of Psychoanalysis 26/27:295-313.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 6:412-415.
• Sandler, J., Dare, C., & Holder, A. (1992). The Patient and the Analyst: The Basis of the Psychoanalytic Process. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
• Stone, A., & Shiffman, S., EDS. (2007). The Science of Real-time Data Capture: Self-reports in Health Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Zelenski, J.M., & Larsen, R.J. (2000). The distribution of emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality 34:178-197.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Zetzel, E. (1956). Current concepts of transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 37:369-376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 55, No. 4, 1321-1353 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/000306510705500411


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nuetzel, E. J. Articles by Prizmic, Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nuetzel, E. J. Articles by Prizmic, Z. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service Family Issues Talking With Your Doctor Social Bookmarking                         What's this?