This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, H. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, H. F. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Subjectivity and Objectivity in Analytic Listening

17 Hammond Street Cambridge, MA 02138-1915, Hfsmith1{at}compuserve.com

Analysts use the concepts of subjectivity and intersubjectivity to support many different technical recommendations; this represents a misuse of theory. The dichotomy between subjectivity and objectivity is a false one. Arguing against the notion of objectivity, analysts conflate it with the idealized notion of pure objectivity and then eliminate various technical devices in its name. One cannot have a concept of subjectivity without a concept of objectivity, or an intersubjective perspective that does not include some agreed-upon concept of objectivity. The simplest definition of objectivity is a directional one. Objectivity is the perception or experience of the external; subjectivity is the perception or experience of the internal. Subjectivity and objectivity are both necessary pathways to knowledge and are dependent on each other. Any form of looking or listening does to some extent preclude another, but to speak solely from a subjective or an objective perspective represents a regression in thinking to a form of naive objectivism or naive subjectivism. Clinical examples illustrate how the forming and testing of hypotheses require the cooperation of both subjective and objective listening.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. F. Smith Common and Uncommon Ground: a Panel Exchange J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2003; 51(4): 1311 - 1335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Wilson The Analyst's Desire and the Problem of Narcissistic Resistances J Am Psychoanal Assoc, March 1, 2003; 51(1): 71 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W.W. Meissner The Problem of Self-Disclosure in Psychoanalysis J Am Psychoanal Assoc, September 1, 2002; 50(3): 827 - 867. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Shapiro From Monologue To Dialogue: a Transition in Psychoanalytic Practice J Am Psychoanal Assoc, March 1, 2002; 50(1): 199 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. F. Smith Book Review: Gender and Sexuality: THE POWER OF FEELINGS: PERSONAL MEANING IN PSYCHOANALYSIS, GENDER, AND CULTURE. By Nancy J. Chodorow. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999, 328 pp., $27.50 J Am Psychoanal Assoc, December 1, 2001; 49(4): 1427 - 1431. [PDF]

				F. Busch Are We Losing Our Mind? J Am Psychoanal Assoc, September 1, 2001; 49(3): 739 - 751. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. N. Eagle, D. L. Wolitzky, J. C. Wakefield, M. N. Eagle, and D. Wolitzky The Analyst's Knowledge and Authority: a Critique of the "New View" in Psychoanalysis J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 2001; 49(2): 457 - 488. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. F. Smith Countertransference, Conflictual Listening, and the Analytic Object Relationship J Am Psychoanal Assoc, March 1, 2000; 48(1): 95 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. F. Smith Arnold Goldberg: Two Heads Are Better Than One J Am Psychoanal Assoc, June 1, 1999; 47(2): 343 - 349. [PDF]